Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
https://trends.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Original Article

Motor skills assessments: support for a general motor factor for the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2

Avaliação de habilidades motoras: suporte a um fator motor geral para o Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 e o Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2

Paola Matiko Martins Okuda; Melissa Pangelinan; Simone A. Capellini; Hugo Cogo-Moreira

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014 Trends Psychiatry Psychother, vol.41, n1, p.51-59, 2019
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 533

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the construct validity and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the subscales of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) when evaluating motor skills across a range of psychiatric disorders. Methods Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor analysis were conducted on BOT-2 data from 187 elementary school students (grades 1 to 6) (mean age: 113 ± 20 months; boys: n = 117, 62.56%) and on MABC-2 data from 127 elementary school students (grade 1) (mean age: 76 ± 2 months; boys: n = 58, 45.67%). Results The results of the CFA fit the data for multidimensionality for the BOT-2 and presented poor fit indices for the MABC-2. For both tests, the bifactor model showed that the reliability of the subscales was poor. Conclusions The BOT-2 exhibited factorial validity with a multidimensional structure among the current samples, but the MABC-2 showed poor fit indices, insufficient to confirm its multidimensional structure. For both tests, most of the reliable variance came from a general motor factor (M-factor), therefore the scoring and reporting of subscale scores were not justified for both tests.

Keywords

Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition, Movement Assessment Battery for Children, psychometrics, motor skills, evaluation report

Resumo

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a validade de construto e a confiabilidade das subescalas do Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) e do Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) com base em modelos das contribuições gerais e específicas ao avaliar habilidades motoras em transtornos psiquiátricos. Métodos Foram realizadas análise fatorial confirmatória (AFC) e análise bifatorial em dados de 187 escolares do primeiro ao sexto ano do ensino fundamental (idade média: 113 ± 20 meses; meninos: n = 117, 62,56%) que foram avaliados com o BOT-2, e em dados de 127 escolares do primeiro ano do ensino fundamental (idade média: 76 ± 2 meses; meninos: n = 58, 45,67%) avaliados com o MABC-2. Resultados Os resultados da AFC apresentaram índices de ajuste satisfatórios de multidimensionalidade para o BOT-2 e apresentaram índices de ajuste insatisfatórios para o MABC-2. Para ambos os testes, o modelo bifatorial mostrou que a confiabilidade das subescalas era ruim. Conclusão O BOT-2 apresentou validade fatorial com uma estrutura multidimensional entre as amostras utilizadas, mas o MABC-2 apresentou índices de ajuste insatisfatórios, insuficientes para confirmar sua estrutura multidimensional. Para ambos os testes, a maior parte da variância confiável veio de um fator motor geral (fator-M), portanto, a pontuação e o relato dos escores das subescalas não se justificaram para ambos os testes.

Palavras-chave

Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition, Movement Assessment Battery for Children, psicometria, habilidades motoras, relatório de avaliação

References

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). 2013.

Pasini A, D’agati E. Pathophysiology of NSS in ADHD. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10:495-502.

Mittal VA, Bernard JA, Northoff G. What can different motor circuits tell us about psychosis? An RDoC perspective. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43:949-55.

Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2: Movement ABC-2: Examiner’s manual. 2007.

Bruininks RH, Bruininks BD. BOT2: Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency: Manual. 2005.

Hua J, Gu G, Meng W, Wu Z. Age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition: exploring its usefulness in mainland China. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:801-8.

Schulz J, Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: factor structure comparisons across three age groups. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1361-9.

Ellinoudis T, Evaggelinou C, Kourtessis T, Konstantinidou Z, Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children--second edition. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:1046-51.

Kita Y, Suzuki K, Hirata S, Sakihara K, Inagaki M, Nakai A. Applicability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition to Japanese children: a study of the age band 2. Brain Dev. 2016;38:706-13.

Valentini NC, Ramalho MH, Oliveira MA. Movement assessment battery for children-2: translation, reliability, and validity for Brazilian children. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:733-40.

Reise SP, Bonifay WE, Haviland MG. Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. J Pers Assess. 2013;95:129-40.

Stucky BD, Edelen MO. Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. Multivariate applications series. Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment. 2015:183-206.

Chen FF, West SG, Sousa KH. A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behav Res. 2006;41:189-225.

Reise SP. The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behav Res. 2012;47:667-96.

Yuan K-H, Bentler PM. On chi-square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educ Psychol Meas. 2004;64:737-57.

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH, Berge JMT. Psychometric theory. 1967.

Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2015.

Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 2012.

Marsh HW, Hau K-T, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struct Equ Modeling. 2004;11:320-41.

Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychol Methods. 2016;21:137-50.

Reise SP. Invited paper: the rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behav Res. 2012;47:667-96.

McDonald RP. Test theory: a unified treatment. 2013.

Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74:145-54.

Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. J Pers Assess. 2016;98:223-37.

Reise SP, Horan WP, Blanchard JJ. The challenges of fitting an item response theory model to the Social Anhedonia Scale. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:213-24.

Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. 2012.

Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009;16:397-438.

Jovanović V. Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;75:154-9.

Wagner F, Martel MM, Cogo-Moreira H, Maia CRM, Pan PM, Rohde LA. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder dimensionality: the reliable ‘g’and the elusive‘s’ dimensions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;25:83-90.

6169b14aa9539547414f43d3 trends Articles
Links & Downloads
2238-0019 (Electronic)
Trends Psychiatry Psychother ©2024 All rights reserved.

Trends Psychiatry Psychother

Share this page
Page Sections