Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
https://trends.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0078
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Original Article

Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3)

Propriedades psicométricas da versão iraniana da Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3)

Ali Akbar Foroughi; Mohsen Mohammadpour; Sajad Khanjani; Sahar Pouyanfard; Nadia Dorouie; Ali Akbar Parvizi Fard

Downloads: 0
Views: 389

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Anxiety sensitivity plays a prominent role in the etiology of anxiety disorders. This construct has attracted widespread interest from experts and researchers. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI-3) is the most common scale for measuring anxiety sensitivity. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties and factor structure of the ASI-3 in Iranian student samples. Methods: 220 students (135 women, 85 men) from Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences were selected by the convenience sampling method to evaluate the psychometric properties and analyze the factor structure of the ASI-3. The subjects were also asked to complete the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), Whiteley Index, Intolerance of Uncertainty, and Neuroticism scales. LISREL and SPSS were used to analyze the data. Cronbach's alpha and correlation coefficients were calculated and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure with physical, cognitive, and social components (comparative fit index = 0.94; normed fit index = 0.91; root mean square error of approximation = 0.09). The ASI-3 had positive and significant correlations with health anxiety (0.59), intolerance of uncertainty (0.29), and neuroticism (0.51). Furthermore, the ASI-3 had a negative and significant correlation with the AAQII (-0.58). Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the whole scale and for the physical, cognitive, and social concerns factors were 0.90, 0.74, 0.79, and 0.78, respectively. The invariance of the index was significant compared to the original English version. Conclusion: In general, the results support the adequacy of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the ASI-3. Theoretical and applied implications will be discussed.

Keywords

Validity and reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3)

Resumo

Resumo Introdução: A sensibilidade à ansiedade desempenha um papel proeminente na etiologia dos transtornos de ansiedade. Esse construto tem atraído grande interesse entre especialistas e pesquisadores. O Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI-3; em português, Escala de Sensibilidade à Ansiedade) é a medida mais utilizada para medir sensibilidade à ansiedade. Objetivo: Analisar as propriedades psicométricas e a estrutura fatorial do ASI-3 em estudantes iranianos. Métodos: Para avaliar as propriedades psicométricas e analisar a estrutura fatorial do ASI-3, 220 estudantes (135 mulheres, 85 homens) da Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Irã, foram selecionados via amostragem por conveniência. Eles foram solicitados a completar os seguintes instrumentos: Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), Whiteley Index, Intolerance of Uncertainty e Neuroticism. Os programas LISREL e SPSS foram utilizados para analisar os dados. Alfa de Cronbach e coeficientes de correlação foram calculados, e foi realizada análise fatorial confirmatória. Resultados: Os resultados da análise fatorial confirmatória revelaram uma estrutura de três fatores, incluindo componentes físicos, cognitivos e sociais [comparative fit index (CFI) = 0,94; normed fit index (NFI) = 0,91; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0,09]. O ASI-3 demonstrou correlações positivas e significativas com ansiedade em relação à saúde (0,59), intolerância à incerteza (0,29) e neuroticismo (0,51). Além disso, o ASI-3 teve uma correlação negativa e significativa com o AAQII (-0,58). Os coeficientes alfa de Cronbach para toda a escala e para os fatores preocupação física, cognitiva e social foram 0,90, 0,74, 0,79 e 0,78, respectivamente. A invariância do índice foi significativa em relação à versão original. Conclusão: Em geral, os resultados sugerem que as propriedades psicométricas da versão persa do ASI-3 são adequadas. Implicações teóricas e práticas serão discutidas.

Palavras-chave

Validade e confiabilidade, análise fatorial confirmatória, Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3), Escala de Sensibilidade à Ansiedade

References

Reiss S, McNally RJ. The expectancy model of fear. Theoretical issue in behavior therapy. 1985:107-21.

Reiss S. Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic. Clin Psychol Rev. 1991;11:141-53.

Taylor S, Cox BJ. An expanded Anxiety Sensitivity Index: evidence for a hierarchic structure in a clinical sample. J Anxiety Disord. 1998;12:463-83.

McNally RJ. Anxiety sensitivity and panic disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:938-46.

Armstrong KA, Khawaja NG, Oei TP. Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-Revised in clinical and normative populations. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2006;22:116-25.

Schmidt NB, Eggleston AM, Woolaway-Bickel K, Fitzpatrick KK, Vasey MW, Richey JA. Anxiety Sensitivity Amelioration Training (ASAT): A longitudinal primary prevention program targeting cognitive vulnerability. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21:302-19.

Taylor S, Rabian B, Fedoroff I. Anxiety sensitivity: Progress, prospects, and challenges. Anxiety sensitivity: theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety. 1999:339-55.

Olatunji BO, Wolitzky-Taylor KB. Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. Behav Dev Bull. 2009;135:974-99.

Schmidt NB, Lerew DR, Jackson RJ. Prospective evaluation of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Replication and extension. J Abnorm Psychol. 1999;108:532-7.

Capron DW, Cougle JR, Ribeiro JD, Joiner TE, Schmidt NB. An interactive model of anxiety sensitivity relevant to suicide attempt history and future suicidal ideation. Psychiatry Res. 2012;46:174-80.

Schmidt NB, Buckner JD, Keough ME. Anxiety sensitivity as a prospective predictor of alcohol use disorders. Behav Modif. 2007;31:202-19.

Deacon BJ, Valentiner DP. Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity and their relationship to nonclinical panic. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2001;23:25-33.

Ebesutani C, McLeish AC, Luberto CM, Young J, Maack DJ. A bifactor model of anxiety sensitivity: analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2014;36:452-64.

Taylor S, Koch WJ, Woody S, McLean P. Anxiety sensitivity and depression: how are they related?. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105:474-9.

Kemper CJ, Ziegler M, Taylor S. Überprüfung der psychometrischen Qualität der deutschen Version des Angstsensitivitätsindex-3. Diagnostica. 2009;55:223-33.

Taylor S, Zvolensky MJ, Cox BJ, Deacon B, Heimberg RG, Ledley DR. Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Psychol Assess. 2007;19:176-88.

Wheaton MG, Deacon BJ, McGrath PB, Berman NC, Abramowitz JS. Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity in the anxiety disorders: evaluation of the ASI-3. J Anxiety Disord. 2012;26:401-8.

Sandin B, Valiente RM, Chorot P, Germán MAS. ASI-3: nueva escala para la evaluación de la sensibilidad a la ansiedad. Rev Psicopatol Psicol Clin. 2007;12:91-104.

Escocard MRPG, Fioravanti-Bastos ACM, Landeira-Fernandez J. Anxiety sensitivity factor structure among brazilian patients with anxiety disorders. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009;31:246-55.

Mantar A, Yemez B, Alkin T. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Anxiety Sensivity Index-3. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2010;21:225-34.

Lim YJ, Kim JH. Korean Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3: its factor structure, reliability, and validity in non-clinical samples. Psychiatry Investig. 2012;9:45-53.

Kemper CJ, Lutz J, Bähr T, Rüddel H, Hock M. Construct validity of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in clinical samples. Assessment. 2012;19:89-100.

Farris SG, DiBello AM, Allan NP, Hogan J, Schmidt NB, Zvolensky MJ. Evaluation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 among treatment-seeking smokers. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:1123-8.

Ghisi M, Bottesi G, Altoè G, Razzetti E, Melli G, Sica C. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in an Italian community sample. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1-13.

Osman A, Gutierrez PM, Smith K, Fang Q, Lozano G, Devine A. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3: analyses of dimensions, reliability estimates, and correlates in nonclinical samples. J Pers Assess. 2010;92:45-52.

Shah R, Goldstein SM. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. Oper Man. 2006;24:148-69.

Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2015.

Pilowsky I. Dimensions of hypochondriasis. Br J Psychiatry. 1967;113:89-93.

Hinz A, Rief W, Brähler E. Hypochondrie in der Allgemeinbevölkerung: Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung des Whiteley-lndex. Diagnostica. 2003;49:34-42.

Welch PG, Carleton RN, Asmundson GJ. Measuring health anxiety: moving past the dichotomous response option of the original Whiteley Index. J Anxiety Disord. 2009;23:1002-7.

Barsky AJ, Cleary PD, Wyshak G, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Klerman GL. A structured diagnostic interview for hypochondriasis: a proposed criterion standard. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180:20-7.

Hiller W, Rief W, Fichter M. Dimensional and categorical approaches to hypochondriasis. Psychol Med. 2002;32:707-18.

Carleton RN, Norton MPJ, Asmundson GJ. Fearing the unknown: a short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21:105-17.

Buhr K, Dugas MJ. The intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the English version. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40:931-45.

Besharat MA, Mirjalili RS, Ehsan HB. The mediating role of meta-cognitive beliefs and cognitive emotion regulation deficit on the relationship between cognitive perfectionism and worry in generalized anxiety disorder. J Fund Ment Health. 2015;17:115-22.

McCrae RR, Costa Jr PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;36:587-96.

Mirzaei A, Nikbakhsh R, Sharififar F. The relationship between personality traits and sport performance. Eur J Exp Bio. 2013;3:439-42.

Anisi J, Majdiyan M, Joshanloo M, Ghoharikamel Z. Validity and reliability of NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) on university students. Int J Beh Sci. 2011;5:351-5.

Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011;42:676-88.

Abasi E, Fti L, Molodi R, Zarabi H. Psychometric properties of Persian version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2013;3:65-80.

Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417-32.

Gjersing L, Caplehorn J.R, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:13.

Hayes SC. Content, context, and the types of psychological acceptance. Acceptance and change: content and context in psychotherapy. 1994:13-32.

Melli G, Carraresi C, Poli A, Bailey RJP. The role of metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;89:80-5.

Norr AM, Albanese BJ, Oglesby ME, Allan NP, Schmidt NB. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria. J Affect Disord. 2015;174:64-9.

MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:130.

Petrocchi N, Tenore K, Couyoumdjian A, Gragnani A. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3: factor structure and psychometric properties in Italian clinical and non-clinical samples. Appl Psychol Bull. 2014;269:53-64.

Allan NP, Capron DW, Raines AM, Schmidt NB. Unique relations among anxiety sensitivity factors and anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28:266-75.

Olthuis JV, Watt MC, Stewart SH. Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI-3) subscales predict unique variance in anxiety and depressive symptoms. J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28:115-24.

Rifkin LS, Beard C, Hsu KJ, Garner L, Björgvinsson T. Psychometric properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in an acute and heterogeneous treatment sample. J Anxiety Disord. 2015;36:99-102.

Mohlman J, Zinbarg RE. The structure and correlates of anxiety sensitivity in older adults. Psychol Assess. 2000;12:440-6.

Naragon-Gainey K. Meta-analysis of the relations of anxiety sensitivity to the depressive and anxiety disorders. Psychol Bull. 2010;136:128-50.

Zinbarg RE, Barlow DH, Brown TA. Hierarchical structure and general factor saturation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index: evidence and implications. Psychol Assess. 1997;9:277-84.

Wheaton MG, Berman NC, Franklin JC, Abramowitz JS. Health anxiety: latent structure and associations with anxiety-related psychological processes in a student sample. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010;32:565-74.

Fergus TA, Bardeen JR. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty: evidence of incremental specificity in relation to health anxiety. Pers Individ Dif. 2013;55:640-4.

O'Bryan EM, McLeish AC. An examination of the indirect effect of intolerance of uncertainty on health anxiety through anxiety sensitivity physical concerns. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2017;39:715-22.

Abramowitz JS, Braddock A. Psychological treatment of health anxiety and hypochondriasis: a biopsychosocial approach. 2008:13-40.

Esteve R, Ramírez-Maestre C, López-Martínez A. Experiential avoidance and anxiety sensitivity as dispositional variables and their relationship to the adjustment to chronic pain. Eur J Pain. 2012;16:718-26.

Kämpfe CK, Gloster AT, Wittchen H-U, Helbig-Lang S, Lang T, Gerlach AL. Experiential avoidance and anxiety sensitivity in patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia: Do both constructs measure the same?. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2013;12:5-22.

6165f422a95395132b635334 trends Articles
Links & Downloads

Trends Psychiatry Psychother

Share this page
Page Sections