Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
https://trends.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0098
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Brief Communication

Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): cross-cultural adaptation and content validity in the Brazilian context

Inventário de Personalidade para o DSM-5 (PID-5): adaptação transcultural e validade de conteúdo para o contexto brasileiro

Ana Maria Barchi-Ferreira; Sonia Regina Loureiro; Albina Rodrigues Torres; Thiago Dornela Apolinário da Silva; André Luiz Moreno; Diogo Araújo DeSousa; Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas; Rafael Guimarães dos Santos; João Paulo Machado-de-Souza; Natália Mota de Sousa Chagas; Jaime Eduardo C. Hallak; José Alexandre de Souza Crippa; Flávia L. Osório

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0098 Trends Psychiatry Psychother, vol.41, n3, p.297-300, 2019
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 1
Views: 716

Abstract

Abstract Objective To describe the process of cross-cultural adaptation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to the Brazilian context. Methods Cross-cultural adaptation involved the steps of independent translation of the instrument, synthesis version, and back-translation. Analysis of content validity was conducted by a multidisciplinary expert committee and consisted of quantitative assessment of agreement indicators. The test was then applied to a target population. Results All the steps required for a cross-cultural adaptation were followed and satisfactory agreement values (≥ 4.75) were reached for most of the structures assessed. Most of the changes suggested by the experts were followed; these changes consisted primarily of adjustments to verb tense and agreement and the inclusion of letters and words to allow gender inflection. In the pre-test, no suggestions were made and the instrument was considered comprehensible. Conclusion The Brazilian version of the PID-5 was found to be adequate to the Brazilian context from semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual perspectives. The Brazilian version assessed here can be freely used, was approved by the publishers who hold the copyright on the instrument, and is considered the official version of the instrument. New studies are underway to determine the validity and reliability of the PID-5.

Keywords

Personality, scale, cross-cultural adaptation, content validity, PID-5

Resumo

Resumo Objetivo Apresentar o processo de adaptação transcultural do Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) para o contexto brasileiro. Métodos A adaptação transcultural envolveu as etapas de tradução independente, versão síntese e retrotradução. A validade de conteúdo foi realizada por um comitê multidisciplinar de especialistas, com avaliação quantitativa dos índices de concordância. Por fim, o pré-teste foi conduzido com a população-alvo. Resultados Todos os estágios da adaptação transcultural foram seguidos, e na maioria das estruturas avaliadas, os valores de concordância foram satisfatórios (≥ 4.75). Grande parte das sugestões de modificações feitas pelos especialistas foram acatadas, sendo as principais relacionadas a ajustes no tempo e concordância verbal e a inclusão de letras e palavras para permitir a flexão de gênero. No pré-teste nenhuma sugestão foi apresentada e o instrumento foi considerado compreensível. Conclusão A versão brasileira do PID-5 mostrou-se adequada ao contexto brasileiro sob as perspectivas semântica, idiomática, cultural e conceitual. A versão brasileira avaliada é de uso livre, foi aprovada pelas editoras responsáveis pelos direitos autorais do instrumento e é considerada oficial. Novos estudos estão sendo conduzidos para aprimorar a busca por evidencias de validade e confiabilidade.

Palavras-chave

Personalidade, escalas, adaptação transcultural, validade de conteúdo, PID-5

References

Tyrer P. Personality dysfunction is the cause of recurrent non-cognitive mental disorder: A testable hypothesis. Pers Ment Health. 2015;9:1-7.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). 2013.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). 2000.

Widiger TA, Trull TJ. Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder. Am Psychol. 2007;62:71-83.

Krueger RF, Eaton NR, Clark LA, Watson D, Markon KE, Derringer J. Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. J Pers Disord. 2011;25:170-91.

Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1879-90.

Fossati A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Borroni S, Maffei C. Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment. 2013;20:689-708.

Zimmermann J, Altenstein D, Krieger T, Holtforth MG, Pretsch J, Alexopoulos J. The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: findings from two German-speaking samples. J Pers Disord. 2014;28:1-23.

De Fruyt F, De Clercq B, De Bolle M, Wille B, Markon KE, Krueger RF. General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment. 2013;20:295-307.

Gutiérrez F, Aluja A, Peri JM, Calvo N, Ferrer M, Baillés E. Psychometric properties of the Spanish PID-5 in a clinical and a community sample. Assessment. 2017;24:326-36.

Al-Attiyah AA, Megreya AM, Alrashidi M, Dominguez-Lara SA, Al-Sheerawi A. The psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across three Arabic speaking middle eastern countries. Int J Cult Ment Health. 2017;10:197-205.

Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Ayearst L, Quilty LC, Chmielewski M, Bagby RM. Associations between DSM-5 Section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 - Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:801-15.

Wright AGC, Pincus AL, Hopwood CJ, Thomas KM, Markon KE, Krueger RF. An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment. 2012;19:263-75.

Al-Dajani N, Gralnick TM, Bagby RM. A psychometric review of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. J Pers Assess. 2016;98:62-81.

Watters CA, Bagby B. A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Assess. 2018;30:1255-60.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-91.

Morales JCP, Greco PJ, Andrade RL. Content validity of the instrument for assessment of the tactical procedural knowledge in basketball. Cuad Psicol Deporte. 2012;12:31-6.

Borsa C, Damasio JF, Bandeira DR. Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paideia. 2012;22:423-32.

Tanzer NK. Developing tests for use in multiple languages and cultures: A plea for simultaneous development. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. 2005:235-64.

Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2011;16:3061-8.

6165f775a9539514a0203e32 trends Articles
Links & Downloads
2238-0019 (Electronic)
Trends Psychiatry Psychother ©2024 All rights reserved.

Trends Psychiatry Psychother

Share this page
Page Sections