Translation and cultural adaptation of the DSM-5 Personality Inventory – Brief Form (PID-5-BF)
Zatti, Cleonice; Oliveira, Sérgio Eduardo Silva de; Guimarães, Luciano Santos Pinto; Calegaro, Vitor Crestani; Benetti, Silvia Pereira da Cruz; Serralta, Fernanda Barcellos; Freitas, Lucia Helena Machado
Abstract
Introduction
The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 – Brief Form (PID-5-BF) – is an instrument for assessment of the five pathological personality traits from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) alternative model of personality disorders.
Objectives
To determine the psychometric properties of the version of the PID-5-BF translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.
Methods
The process of translating and cross-culturally adapting the text was carried out by independent translators and the resulting version was administered to 176 patients in two hospitals in Rio Grande do Sul. The internal structure was tested by means of confirmatory factor analysis. Evidence of reliability was tested by examining the internal consistency of the scales and their convergent and concurrent validity with other methods of psychopathology.
Results
The five factors were replicated in the present sample with adequate indicators of fit of the data to the model. Appropriate reliability coefficients for the scales and evidence of validity were observed, indicating the clinical usefulness of the PID-5-BF in the Brazilian context.
Conclusion
The psychometric properties of PID-5-BF proved satisfactory in an initial sample of Brazilians.
Keywords
References
1 American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5: Manual diagnóstico e estatístico de transtornos mentais. 5ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2014.
2 Combaluzier S, Gouvernet B, Menant F, Rezrazi A. Validation d’une version française de la forme brève de l’inventaire des troubles de la personnalité pour le DSM-5 (PID-5 BF) de Krueger. L’Encéphale. 2018;44:9-13.
3 Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1879-90.
4 Widiger TA, Simonsen E. Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. J Pers Disord. 2005;19:110-30.
5 Pires R, Ferreira AS, Guedes D, Gonçalves B, Calado JH. A study of the psychometric qualities of the Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Full Version, Reduced Form and Brief Form. RIDEP. 2018;47:197-212.
6 Markon KE, Quilty LC, Bagby RM, Krueger RF. The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment. 2013;20:370-83.
7 Maples JL, Carter NT, Few LR, Crego C, Gore WL, Samuel DB, et al. Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:1195-210.
8 Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form (PID-5-BF) – Adult. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
9 Kerber A, Schultze M, Müller S, Wright AGC, Spitzer C, Krueger RF, et al. Development of a short and ICD-11 compatible measure for DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits using ant colony optimization algorithms [Internet]. PsyArXiv; 2019. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rsw54 » https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rsw54
10 Bach B, Kerber A, Aluja A, Bastiaens T, Keeley J, Claes L, et al. International assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder traits: toward a common nosology in DSM-5. Psychopathology. 2020 May 5:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000507589. [Epub ahead of print]
11 Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Salekin RT. Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 – Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment. 2018;25:596-607.
12 Bach B, Maples-Keller JL, Bo S, Simonsen E. The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: a comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population. Personal Disord. 2016;7:124-35.
13 Fossati A, Somma A, Borroni S, Markon KE, Krueger RF. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: evidence for reliability and construct validity in a sample of community-dwelling Italian adolescents. Assessment. 2017;24:615-31.
14 Góngora VC, Solano AC. Pathological personality traits (DSM-5), risk factors and mental health. SAGE Open. 2017;7:2158244017725129.
15 Pesce RP, Assis SG, Avanci JQ, Santos NC, Malaquias JV, Carvalhaes R. Adaptação transcultural, confiabilidade e validade da escala de resiliência. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21:436-48.
16 Barchi-Ferreira AM, Loureiro SR, Torres AR, da Silva TDA, Moreno AL, de Sousa DA, et al. Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): cross-cultural adaptation and content validity in the Brazilian context. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019;41:297-00.
17 Lugo V, Oliveira SES, Hessel CR, Monteiro RT, Pasche NL, Pavan G, et al. Evaluation of DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 (PID‐5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients. Personal Ment Health. 2019;13:24-39.
18 Amorim P. Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): validation of a short structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. Braz J Psychiatry. 2000;22:106-15.
19 Hair JR, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson REE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.
20 Schwab JA. Multinomial logistic regression: basic relationships and complete problems [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2018 Jan 22]. http://www.utexas.edu/courses/schwab/sw388r7/solvingproblems » http://www.utexas.edu/courses/schwab/sw388r7/solvingproblems
21 Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2012.
22 Hair JR, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson REE, Tatham RL. Análise multivariada de dados. 6ª ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2009.
23 Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18:39-50.
24 Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-34.
25 Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105:399-412.
26 Peterson RA, Kim Y. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J Appl Psychol. 2013;989:194-8.
27 Linehan MM, Rizvi S, Welch SS, Page B. Psychiatric aspects of suicidal behaviour: personality disorders. In: The international handbook of suicide and attempted suicide. Hoboken: John Wiley; 2008. p. 147-78.
28 Blackburn R, Logan C, Donnelly J, Renwick S. Personality disorders, psychopathy and other mental disorders: co-morbidity among patients at English and Scottish high-security hospitals. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2003;14:111-37.
29 Chu C, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Joiner TE, Rudd MD. Personality disorder symptoms and suicidality: low desire and high plans for suicide in military inpatients and outpatients. J Pers Disord. 2017;31:145-55.
30 Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Huang X, et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143:187-232.
31 Hall-Lande JA, Eisenberg ME, Christenson SL, Neumark-Sztainer D. Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence. 2007;42:265-86.
32 Yen S, Shea MT, Sanislow CA, Skodol AE, Grilo CM, Edelen MO, et al. Personality traits as prospective predictors of suicide attempts. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;120:222-9.
33 Goñi-Sarriés A, Blanco M, Azcárate L, Peinado R, López-Goñi JJ. Are previous suicide attempts a risk factor for completed suicide? Psicothema. 2018;30:33-8.
34 Barbosa FO, Macedo PCM, Silveira RMC. Depressão e o suicídio. Rev SBPH. 2011;14:233-43.
35 Wright AG, Simms LJ. A metastructural model of mental disorders and pathological personality traits. Psychol Med. 2015;45:2309-19.
36 Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Achenbach TM, Althoff RR, Bagby RM, et al. The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017;126:454-77.
37 Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D. A paradigm shift in psychiatric classification: the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). World Psychiatry. 2018;17:24-5.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email